The misdemeanor court acquitted our client of the seizure charge in accordance with the provisions of Article 240 of the Penal Code and deliberate destruction.

07 Apr The misdemeanor court acquitted our client of the seizure charge in accordance with the provisions of Article 240 of the Penal Code and deliberate destruction.

The justice of the court responded to our defense presented before it with the codes of its judgment
Whereas it is legally established and established by jurisprudence and the judiciary that delay in returning the thing or refraining from returning it until the material element of the crime of breach of trust is not achieved by it unless it is connected with the perpetrator’s intention to add the money that he received to his property and embezzlement for himself to the detriment of its owner
In addition, the criminal intent in that crime is not achieved simply because the perpetrator refuses to respond, but rather requires proving the intention that this money possesses and depriving the owner of it.